HOME | message board | videos | photos |

Reading all 49 messages in thread
message board home

7/25/2024 1:01:23 PM

Reply or ReplyNewSubject
Section 4: President & Congress
Subject: Kamala news Msg# 1208250

From:

Tom Hemmick Forum Leader

Joined 7/21/2005

To: All

I got a hearty laugh from Thursday's news. Just about the entire population of news watchers could find some amusement out of the Dem attempts to claim that Kamala was NOT the border Czar. Trying to walk it back when practically everyone knows that she had that nickname, as she was appointed early in Biden's presidency to try and control the illegal migration.

Commentators were constantly discussing her border efforts which turned out to be total failures. Lester Holt challenged her absence from even visiting the border.

Remember how she claimed to be solving the "root causes" of the migration. But instead there were mounting volumes of migrants coming in. There were larger and larger caravans, There were more on the lists of terrorists and known criminals. There were more "got-aways". Even more illegal entry of the poisonous Fentanyl.

More than 10 million illegal migrants amounts to dismal record, and a big failure by Kamala. Now the blue sanctuary cities like New York are howling their objections, and suffering from the funding demands of supporting those millions of illegals. Its created chaos, with so many examples.

And there's so many sources buying into the distortion of history. Sorry media, but that BS belongs in the cow pasture.

Here's some of today's many headlines: Pro-Harris media scrambles to erase ‘Border Czar’ from her resume as GOP highlights her record Click Here

Gaslighting the Public on Kamala Harris as ‘Border Czar’
The press rewrites recent history to accommodate the current political environment. Click Here

Would you consider this merely amusing, or as evidence of heavy slanting of news, favoring the Dems(?)

For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where:
With Biden trying to explain in tonight's speech his decision not to run, seems the media will next be issuing wall to wall favorable news stories about Kamala. Yet there's plenty of failures in her political history. I'd suggest there will be plenty of reports focusing upon her problems & failures

Even a NY TIMES story today has pointed out a scathing variety of her problems. Its titled: Democrats Deserved a Contest, Not a Coronation Click Here

Here's the subtitles from that report:

She’s unpopular
She’s been a bad campaigner
She’s been a bad manager
She has a penchant for excruciating banality
She’s a blue-state Democrat who needs to win purple states
She’s anchored to Joe Biden’s record
Her career smacks of connections and favoritism

As of July 22, only 38.3 percent of Americans approve of Harris, as against 51.4 percent who don’t, according to FiveThirtyEight (a poll averaging organization.) She has not had a positive approval rate since September 2021. Why would Democrats rush to nominate a candidate who’s been so consistently underwater with the electorate?

And let's not forget that 92% of Kamala's staff have left and gone elsewhere. “People really do not want to work for Kamala Harris,” one former staffer Dan McLaughlin wrote in January 2022. Some of the top positions that quit in her initial 18 months as Veep were: her chief of staff, communications director, domestic-policy adviser, & national security adviser.

And here's a quote told to the Washington Post: “With Kamala, you have to put up with a constant amount of soul-destroying criticism and also her own lack of confidence. So you’re constantly sort of propping up a bully and it’s not really clear why.”

Watchdog group reports stunning 92% staff turnover for Kamala Harris Click Here

message board home