|
Politics Forum
|
List All Forums | About |
Reading all
22 messages in thread
message board home
message board home
Next
6/16/2022 9:21:48 PM
 
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 4: President & Congress Subject: John Eastman Msg# 1161700
|
||||||
|
Thanks Mark for describing today's interview of Jamie Raskin, as a member of the [illegal] Jan6 committee.
You've said: When the ABC host asked him [Jamie Raskin] "Can you give us an example of something new?" his response was "No, not now" After Raskin said "no not now" did you surmise that his statement about "some new info." coming forward "every single day" was lacking credibility --was inaccurate --was intentionally misleading?? Readers can chose. So now we're hearing an example how a mainstream ABC station had its skepticism working. Seems a broadening of the journalistic skepticism against Nancy &/or against congressional-Dems &/or against their insurrection claims. Again, readers can chose. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: Jamie Raskin was interviewed by ABC earlier today and responded to claims that the Jan6 hearings had not uncovered anything new, just summarizing "old news". His response was that new information has come forward every single day and that it was being incorporated into their "presentation". When the ABC host asked him "Can you give us an example of something new?" his response was "No, not now" |
