|
Politics Forum
|
List All Forums | About |
Reading all
35 messages in thread
message board home
message board home
Next
2/7/2025 4:50:09 PM
 
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 4: President & Congress Subject: Women's Sports Now Protected Msg# 1220292
|
||||||
|
We're talking trans "women" (men) here, not scientific anomalies--which have not been a problem. I know what I'm talking about--the forum knows what I'm talking about--and YOU know what I'm talking about. YOU just continue your attempt to try to sidetrack the discussion with this scientific stuff that is NOT RELEVANT TO THIS DISCUSSION. If you cannot stay on topic then I'm done talking to you about it.
Please remember this next time you accuse all conservatives here as unwilling to have calm and rational discussions with liberals. You know I am willing. But there comes a point when you just deflect beyond the point where debate is still possible. |
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: Why are you bring up the numbers, Jim? EVEN ONE TRANS MALE ENGAGING IN WOMEN'S SPORTS AND RUINING IT FOR WOMEN IS ONE TOO MANY. The conversation on here seems to imply that it is a rampant problem. I don't think it is. I have already said that I think that men in women's sports, locker rooms, etc. is not good. But we need to take into account chromosomes, genetics, and other anomalies in order to determine someone's gender. It's not all black and white. Some who on their birth certificate are declared male, might actually be genetically or biologically female. |
