Politics Forum
|
List All Forums | About |
10/30/2024 7:42:57 PM
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 4: President & Congress Subject: Newspaper Endorsement Shocks Msg# 1214312
|
||||||
You need to start following your own party a little closer, it's because of them we're in the mess we are. Can't believe you still defend the undefendable. It hasn't been Trump exacting revenge, it's the Fine Democratic party you follow. It's amazing all the articles you believe in. I believe it was Biden and Kamala locking up people if they followed a different political party not Trump. Biden is as crooked as they come and all you can talk about is Trump. Jim how's Truth Social doing? A few more billion to the bank,what a stupid person he is after all he did go bankrupt, right. Daddy been dead for years, so Trump must have done something right. | ||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: By the way--here's an opinion regarding newspapers being "courageous enough to support their candidate of choice." There is no courage involved. Trump has stated that he will exact revenge on those who oppose him. I have no doubt that, given the opportunity, he will do just that. The Washington Post is small potatoes. Bezos is more concerned about Amazon being the target of Trump's revenge. A look into Trump's recent rhetoric focusing on revenge and threats Trump's enemies, identified An NPR investigation has found more than 100 times when Trump has said his rivals, critics and even private citizens should be investigated, prosecuted, put in jail or otherwise punished. NPR Investigative Correspondent Tom Dreisbach outlined just a few:
The credibility of these threats. Ian Bassin is an expert on authoritarian movements with the group Protect Democracy. He says that Trump's threats could endanger Americans' civil liberties. "This is how autocrats cement their permanent grip on power," Bassin told NPR. All of these threats raise a question: if Trump won reelection, could he tell the Justice Department to go after all of these people? Bassin says the answer is, essentially, yes. "There are not really legal restrictions or even structural restrictions that would stop the president from simply directing them to go and investigate his perceived opponents," Bassin said. |