Politics Forum
|
List All Forums | About |
3/9/2023 1:57:44 AM
Reply
or ReplyNewSubject
Section 4: President & Congress Subject: joe and fema Msg# 1183210
|
||||||
I'm not addressing this to Jim M. because he seems to only want to protect the Democrat machine.
And how is that inclusive? A false statement critical of me (of whom you have little knowledge.) It shows me how willing you are to discuss issues from the perspctive of both sides of the aisle. You call me biased while you push only one viewpoint. You weren't excluded from the conversation. Normally, one replies to the poster. You replied to all of your budies asking what they thought of my post. You said that Biden was uncaring? The White House told DeWine who to contact for help. He seemed happy with that. Why were you not? Biden told one of our agencies he sent there to go door-to-door to check on the safety of the residents. Uncaring? Maybe he should have held a photo op in which he tossed out rolls of paper towels to eager recipients. I've tried to be fair with you, Jim, but you have an agenda and it's quite obvious. Yet you take no ownership of your agenda. You get in a tizzy and accuse other members of insulting things, yet refuse to accept responsibility for things you say that may not be factual. Thank you for bending over backward to be fair. But you are pushing such a strong agenda that you can't see that there are (at least) two sides to every issue. And you (the forum) refuse to discuss anything that chalenges your (the forum's) right-wing radical point of view. |
||||||
|
||||||
For reference, the above message is a reply to a message where: A member replies to MY post, and wants to exclude ME from the conversation! All most of the right-wing radicals on this ?forum? want to do is to praise their idols, bash the Democrats, and pat each other on the back. Its just a right-wing radical Republican love fest. This group wants no political discussions or debates that lie outside its very narrow-minded viewpoints. You weren't excluded from the conversation. It takes the Sysop (Joe Reynolds) to exclude anyone from these conversations, so please don't claim things that are not happening. We all note that you replied regardless of me addressing my message to "all." I just wanted to say that I wasn't directing my comments to you or asking for your opinion, as I believed you'd already stated your opinion. As to the rest of your insulting rant above, these things work both ways. You said nothing about the topic at hand, you simply bashed "right-wing radical Republicans" as hard as you could without getting censured. I've tried to be fair with you, Jim, but you have an agenda and it's quite obvious. Yet you take no ownership of your agenda. You get in a tizzy and accuse other members of insulting things, yet refuse to accept responsibility for things you say that may not be factual. Can I recommend a little inward retrospection? |